I think you have to be careful when writing a piece like In the Combat Zone. The message is clearly about breaking the stigma of female helplessness, and acknowledging the dangers we face. But at the same time, it offers a very strong view point that defends gun use, the one thing that equalizes all. I understand why she puts forth such a strong voice for that kind of self defense, but I don't really agree with it. A gun is just an object outside of our own selves, and one that can be used against us if given the opportunity. Plus instilling the 'ready to kill' instinct in women is, in my opinion, a bad idea. To have to kill one person to save another is a sad thought. It just seems like a depressing way of emphasizing a person's helplessness, that such extremes have to be taken. It also makes everyone seem like a potential threat, and that kind of suspicion can really alienate others. What if she felt threatened by Brent Staples walking down the street? And what if he, feeling angry at his being persecuted, veered towards her for sport? I just think it's important to think about the details, and not just take the 'whatever it takes' kind of attitude regarding self defense and gun use.